Representative Steven 'Steve' J. Chabot's Special Interest Group Ratings

Biographical

Full Name: Steven 'Steve' J. Chabot
Current Office: U.S. House - District 1, Republican
First Elected: 11/08/1994
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House - District 1
General Nov. 4, 2014
Primary May 6, 2014
Gender: Male
Family: Wife: Donna; 2 Children: Erica, Randy
Birth Date: 01/22/1953
Birth Place: Cincinnati, OH
Home City: Cincinnati, OH
Religion: Roman Catholic
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Environment

2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 33% 2013 Environment America - Positions 0% 2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 23% 2013 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 18% 2013 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 7% 2012 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 14% 2012 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 19% 2012 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean water (House Only) 0% 2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 3% 2011-2012 Environment America - Positions 11% 2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 29% 2011-2012 League of Conservation Voters - Session Score 10% 2011-2012 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions (House Only) 43% 2011 Environment America - Positions 0% 2011 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 19% 2011 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 6% 2011 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean Water (House Only) 0% 2011 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions (House Only) 8 2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0% 2008 Environment America - Positions 15% 2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 25% 2007-2008 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 15% 2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 23 2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 23 2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 40% 2007 League of Conservation Voters - First Session Score 20% 2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 80% 2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 25 2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 25 2006 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 8% 2006 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 0% 2005-2006 American Forest and Paper Association - Positions 100% 2005-2006 American Lands Alliance - Positions 11% 2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 16% 2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 6% 2005-2006 Partnership for America - Positions 93% 2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0% 2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 21 2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 21 2005 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 11% 2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 0% 2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 40% 2003-2004 American Lands Alliance - Positions 10% 2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 9% 2003-2004 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 16% 2003-2004 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 34% 2003-2004 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 9% 2003 American Lands Alliance - Positions 13% 2003 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 15% 2003 Sierra Club - Positions 25% 2002 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 33% 2001-2002 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0% 2001-2002 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 18% 2001-2002 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 9% 2001 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 50% 1999-2000 American Lands Alliance - Positions 50% 1999-2000 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 30% 1999 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 38% 1998 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 38% 1997 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 38% 1995-1996 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 27%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.