Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

George V. Voinovich's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2010 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 30%
2010 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 67%
2009-2010 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 20%
2009-2010 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 59%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 21%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 36%
2009-2010 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 33%
2009-2010 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 36%
2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -5%
2009 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 35%
2009 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 27%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 44%
2009 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 48%
2008 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 25%
2008 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions on Middle Class Advocacy 40
2007-2008 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 29%
2007-2008 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 60%
2007-2008 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions on Civil and Human 33
2007-2008 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions on Civil Rights and Social Justice Issues 59%
2007-2008 National Organization for Women - Positions 19%
2007-2008 The Arc - Positions 0%
2007-2008 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 0
2007 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 43
2007 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 25%
2007 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions on Middle Class Advocacy 33
2007 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 38%
2007 League of Women Voters - Civil Liberties and Civil Rights Score 33%
2007 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 53%
2007 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights +1
2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur B
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 100%
2006 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 20%
2006 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 0%
2006 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 15%
2006 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur C
2005-2006 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 17%
2005-2006 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 0%
2005-2006 Iranian American Political Action Committee - Positions 100%
2005-2006 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 25%
2005-2006 National Organization for Women - Positions 9%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -5
2005 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 15%
2005 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 0%
2005 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 12%
2005 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 15%
2005 National Council of La Raza - Positions 50%
2005 National Organization for Women - Positions 0%
2004 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 30%
2004 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 14%
2003-2004 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 33%
2003-2004 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 13%
2003-2004 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 7%
2003-2004 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 50%
2003-2004 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 21%
2003-2004 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -5
2003 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 15%
2003 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 67%
2003 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 6%
2003 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 11%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -1
2001-2002 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 40%
2001-2002 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 14%
2001-2002 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 14%
2001-2002 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 25%
2001-2002 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 18%
2001-2002 People for the American Way - Positions 8%
2001 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 50%
2001 Common Cause - Positions 0%
2001 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 20%
2001 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 27%
2001 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 9%
2000 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 33%
2000 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 38%
2000 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 33%
1999-2000 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 43%
1999-2000 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 25%
1999 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 40%
1999 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 17%
1999 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 33%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top