or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Janet Kay R. Hagan

Janet Kay R. Hagan's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Social

Full Name: Janet Kay R. Hagan
Current Office: U.S. Senate - Jr, Democratic
First Elected: 11/04/2008
Last Elected: 11/04/2008
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. Senate
Primary May 6, 2014

Social

2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 6%
2013-2014 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score (Jan. 13, 2014) 46%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes Lifetime Score 69%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Lifetime Score 87%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes 58%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Overall Positions 85%
2013 Americans United for the Separation of Church and State - Positions 0%
2013 Bread for the World - Positions 71%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2013 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2013 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 51%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy 48%
2013 National Right to Life Committee - Positions (Jan. 14, 2014) 0%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 40%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 40%
2012 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 85%
2012 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2012 Catholic Advocate - Positions 0%
2012 Catholic Advocate - Positions 0%
2012 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 86%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2012 Family Research Council - Positions 0%
2012 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 67%
2012 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2012 National Journal - Senate Liberal (Social) 49%
2012 National Journal - Senate Conservative (Social) 48%
2012 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 91%
2012 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 91%
2012 Open Doors USA - Positions 25%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 20%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 20%
2011-2012 ACT! for America - Positions 8%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 6%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 4%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 19%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 63%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 44%
2011-2012 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0%
2011 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2011 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 100%
2011 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 10%
2011 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 10%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2011 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 68%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 21%
2011 Family Research Council - Positions 0%
2011 Family Research Council - Positions 0%
2011 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 52%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 48%
2011 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 30%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 30%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 30%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 30%
2010 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 85%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2010 Liberty Central - Positions on Conservative Issues F
2010 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 53%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 46%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 0%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 0%
2010 Vote Kids - Positions 77%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 50%
2009-2010 American Family Association - Positions 0%
2009-2010 American Family Association - Positions 0%
2009-2010 American Immigration Lawyers Association - U.S. Senate Score 75%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 11%
2009-2010 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 78%
2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 3%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 3%
2009-2010 Family Research Council - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Family Research Council - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 9
2009-2010 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0%
2009-2010 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 71%
2009-2010 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 71%
2009-2010 Secular Coalition for America - U.S. Senate Score 92%
2009-2010 St. Joseph Health System - Positions 100%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 0%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 3%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 3%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 3%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 3%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 0%
2009 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 7%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 12%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 18%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 18%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 52%
2009 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 45%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 54%
2009 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0%
2009 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100%
2009 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 55%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 6%
2009 The Children's Health Fund - Positions 100%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 5%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 0%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 0%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 10%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 10%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 5%
2009 Vote Kids - Positions 77%
2008 Civitas Action - Positions 21.2
2007 North Carolina Public Interest Research Group - Positions on Public Interest Advocacy 89
2005 North Carolina Public Interest Research Group - Positions 60%
2004 North Carolina Public Interest Research Group - Positions 100%
2003 North Carolina Public Interest Research Group - Positions 86%
2001 North Carolina Public Interest Research Group - Positions 80%
1999 Alliance for Good Government - Positions 93%
1999 Christian Coalition of North Carolina - Positions 18%
1999 Christian Coalition of North Carolina - Positions 18%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top