or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Jon Tester

Senator Jon Tester's Special Interest Group Ratings

Jon Tester
Full Name: Jon Tester
Current Office: U.S. Senate - Jr, Democratic
First Elected: 11/07/2006
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2018

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2012 Open Doors USA - Positions 75%
2011-2012 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 75%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 56%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 75%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 6%
2009-2010 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 80%
2009-2010 Arab American Institute - Positions 50%
2009-2010 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 80%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 63%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 23
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 48%
2009-2010 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 91%
2009-2010 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 90%
2009 American Library Association - Positions 33%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 48%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 17%
2009 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 90%
2008 American Library Association - Positions 25%
2007-2008 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 93%
2007-2008 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 80%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Right Wing Index Score 0%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 31%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Oath of Office Score 33%
2007-2008 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions on Civil and Human 61
2007-2008 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions on Civil Rights and Social Justice Issues 90%
2007-2008 The American Hellenic Educational Progressive Association - Greek American Issues Score 53%
2007 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 86
2007 American Library Association - Positions 38%
2007 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab American Issues 50%
2007 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 62%
2007 League of Women Voters - Civil Liberties and Civil Rights Score 100%
2007 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 100%
2005 Montana Human Rights Network - Positions 75%
2003 Montana Human Rights Network - Positions 100%
2001 Montana Human Rights Network - Positions 33%
1999 Montana Human Rights Network - Positions 70%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top