or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Jon Tester

Senator Jon Tester's Special Interest Group Ratings

Jon Tester
Full Name: Jon Tester
Current Office: U.S. Senate - Jr, Democratic
First Elected: 11/07/2006
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2018

Business and Consumers

2012 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 77%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 75%
2011 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 66%
2011 National Retail Federation - Positions 14%
2011 National Small Business Association - Positions 50%
2011 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 50%
2011 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 75%
2011 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 45%
2010 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 40%
2010 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 36%
2009-2010 American Council of Engineering Companies - Positions 80%
2009-2010 Associated General Contractors of America - Positions 40%
2009-2010 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 42%
2009-2010 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 23%
2009-2010 National Retail Federation - Positions 11%
2009-2010 National Small Business Association - Positions (Senate Only) 50%
2009-2010 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 60%
2009-2010 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 26%
2009 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 57%
2008 Business-Industry Political Action Committee - Positions 0%
2008 The Alliance for Worker Freedom - Positions 0%
2008 United States Chamber of Commerce - Lifetime Score 47%
2008 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 63%
2007-2008 American Forest and Paper Association - Forest Products Advocacy Score 0%
2007-2008 Associated Builders & Contractors - Positions 0%
2007-2008 Associated General Contractors of America - Positions 33%
2007-2008 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 0%
2007-2008 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 8%
2007-2008 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 73
2007-2008 National Restaurant Association - Positions on Restaurant Advocacy 14
2007-2008 National Retail Federation - Positions Retail Industry Advocacy 0%
2007-2008 National Small Business Association - Positions 50%
2007-2008 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 80%
2007-2008 Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors-National Association - Positions 80%
2007 Business-Industry Political Action Committee - Positions 13%
2007 Consumer Alliance for Energy Security - Positions 0%
2007 The Alliance for Worker Freedom - Positions 0%
2007 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 25%
2007 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 30%
2005-2006 Montana National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 50%
2005 Montana Chamber of Commerce - Positions 36%
2003 Montana Chamber of Commerce - Positions 43%
2001 Montana Chamber of Commerce - Positions 53%
2001 Montana National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 90%
1999 Montana Chamber of Commerce - Positions 67%
1999 Montana National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 56%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top