Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Jim G. Shockley's Ratings and Endorsements

Environment

2011 Montana Audubon - Positions 45%
2011 Montana Conservation Voters - Positions 38%
2011 Northern Plains Resource Council - Positions 36%
2009 Montana Audubon - Positions 31%
2009 Montana Conservation Voters - Positions 38%
2009 Montana Environmental Information Center - Positions 20%
2009 Montanans for Multiple Use - Positions 40%
2009 Northern Plains Resource Council - Positions 27%
2007 Montana Audubon - Positions 58
2007 Montana Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 45
2007 Montana Environmental Information Center - Positions 30%
2007 Montanans for Multiple Use - Positions on Public Land Access 67%
2007 Northern Plains Resource Council - Positions 30%
2005 Montana Audubon - Positions 33%
2005 Montana Conservation Voters - Positions 42%
2005 Montana Environmental Information Center - Positions 20%
2005 Montanans for Multiple Use - Positions on Public Land Access 73%
2005 Northern Plains Resource Council - Positions 33%
2003 Montana Audubon - Positions 42%
2003 Montana Conservation Voters - Positions 36%
2003 Montana Environmental Information Center - Positions 50%
2003 Northern Plains Resource Council - Positions 33%
2001 Montana Audubon - Positions 42%
2001 Montana Conservation Voters - Positions 24%
2001 Montana Environmental Information Center - Positions 8%
2001 Northern Plains Resource Council - Positions 33%
2000 Montana Conservation Voters - Positions 50%
1999 Montana Conservation Voters - Positions 56%
1999 Montana Environmental Information Center - Positions 25%
1999 Northern Plains Resource Council - Positions 67%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top