or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Norm Coleman

Norm Coleman's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Women

Full Name: Norm Coleman

Women

2007-2008 American Association of University Women - Positions 70%
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 60%
2007-2008 National Organization for Women - Positions 33%
2007 American Association of University Women - Positions 83
2007 Federally Employed Women - Positions 50%
2007 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2006 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2005-2006 American Association of University Women - Positions 30%
2005-2006 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 83%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Federally Employed Women - Positions 30%
2005-2006 National Organization for Women - Positions 17%
2005 American Association of University Women - Positions 33%
2005 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2005 National Organization for Women - Positions 25%
2005 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 0%
2004 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2003-2004 American Association of University Women - Positions 25%
2003-2004 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 54%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 93%
2003-2004 Federally Employed Women - Positions 30%
2003-2004 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 34%
2003 American Association of University Women - Positions 20%
2003 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Positions 0%
2003 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 40%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2003 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top