or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Scott P. Brown

Scott P. Brown's Special Interest Group Ratings

Scott P. Brown
Full Name: Scott P. Brown

Business and Consumers

2012 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 77%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 38%
2011 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2011 National Retail Federation - Positions 85%
2011 National Small Business Association - Positions 100%
2011 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 100%
2011 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 100%
2011 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 91%
2010 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 100%
2010 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 82%
2009-2010 American Council of Engineering Companies - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Associated General Contractors of America - Positions 83%
2009-2010 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 87%
2009-2010 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 100%
2009-2010 National Retail Federation - Positions 77%
2009-2010 National Small Business Association - Positions (Senate Only) 0%
2009-2010 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 91%
2007-2008 Associated Industries of Massachusetts - Positions 67%
2007-2008 Massachusetts National Federation of Independent Business - Positions on Pro-Small Business Policy 100
2006 Massachusetts National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Associated Industries of Massachusetts - Positions 89%
2003-2004 Associated Industries of Massachusetts - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Massachusetts National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%

Conservative

2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 36%
2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 53%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 39%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 50%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 62%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 66%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 33%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 44%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 56%
2011 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 45%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 55%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 56%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 55%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 44%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 44%
2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 49%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 35%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 50%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 74%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 74%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 85%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 36%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 37%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 30%
2010 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 35%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 62%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 63%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 67%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 65%
2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 62%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 80%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 66%
2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 71%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 69%

Environment

2011-2012 Clean Water Action - Positions 38%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 38%
2011 Environment America - Positions 54%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 22%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 36%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 0%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2009-2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Massachusetts League of Enviromental Voters - State Senate Score 35%
2008-2011 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 75%
2008 Massachusetts Audubon Society (Legislative Affairs) - Positions 72%
2008 Massachusetts League of Enviromental Voters - Positions 82%
2007 Massachusetts Audubon Society (Legislative Affairs) - Positions on Environmental Conservation 100
2006 Massachusetts Audubon Society (Legislative Affairs) - Positions on Environmental Conservation 78
2006 Massachusetts League of Enviromental Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 61%
2005 Massachusetts Audubon Society (Legislative Affairs) - Positions 56%
2004 Massachusetts Audubon Society (Legislative Affairs) - Positions 75%
2002 Massachusetts Audubon Society (Legislative Affairs) - Positions 86%
2001 Massachusetts Audubon Society (Legislative Affairs) - Positions 33%
2000 Massachusetts Audubon Society (Legislative Affairs) - Positions 53%
1999 Massachusetts Audubon Society (Legislative Affairs) - Positions 45%

Labor Unions

2011-2012 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 0%
2011 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 25%
2011 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 21%
2011 Federally Employed Women - Positions 0%
2011 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 0%
2010 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 14%
2010 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 44%
2010 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 20%
2010 Federally Employed Women - Positions 10%
2010 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 25%
2009-2010 Communications Workers of America - Positions 0%
2009-2010 International Brotherhood of Teamsters - Positions 25%
2009-2010 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 17%
2009 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 0%
2009 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score 0%
2005-2008 Massachusetts AFL-CIO - Positions 82%
2002-2006 Massachusetts AFL-CIO - Positions on Workplace Rights 53%
2001-2005 Massachusetts AFL-CIO - Positions 48%
2001-2002 Massachusetts AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
1999-2002 Massachusetts AFL-CIO - Positions 63%
1999 Massachusetts AFL-CIO - Positions 60%

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

2009-2010 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 33%

Technology and Communication

2009-2010 Communications Workers of America - Positions 0%
2009-2010 MassTrack - Positions 87%
2007-2008 MassTrack - Positions 87%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top