Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Michael 'Mike' E. Capuano's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Environment

Office: U.S. House (MA) - District 7, Democratic

Environment

2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 83%
2013 Environment America - Positions 100%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 85%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 96%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 95%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 91%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 95%
2012 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean water (House Only) 100%
2011-2012 Clean Water Action - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Environment America - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 100%
2011-2012 League of Conservation Voters - Session Score 94%
2011-2012 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions (House Only) 86%
2011 Environment America - Positions 100%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 97%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 96%
2011 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean Water (House Only) 100%
2011 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions (House Only) 92
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 95%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2009-2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 96%
2009-2010 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 83%
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2009 Environment America - Positions 93%
2009 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 93%
2008 Environment America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 94%
2007-2008 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 97%
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 90%
2007 League of Conservation Voters - First Session Score 95%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 14%
2006 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2006 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 100%
2005-2006 American Forest and Paper Association - Positions 16%
2005-2006 American Lands Alliance - Positions 89%
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 90%
2005-2006 Partnership for America - Positions 0%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 100%
2005 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 94%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 100%
2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 80%
2003-2004 American Lands Alliance - Positions 90%
2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 82%
2003-2004 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 90%
2003-2004 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 84%
2003-2004 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 86%
2003 American Lands Alliance - Positions 100%
2003 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2003 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 90%
2003 Sierra Club - Positions 100%
2002 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 33%
2001-2002 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 80%
2001-2002 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 95%
2001-2002 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 67%
2001-2002 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 94%
2001 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 50%
1999-2000 American Lands Alliance - Positions 100%
1999-2000 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 97%
1999-2000 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 87%
1999 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top