or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Lynn M. Jenkins

Lynn M. Jenkins's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Social

Full Name: Lynn M. Jenkins
Current Office: U.S. House - District 2, Republican
First Elected: 11/04/2008
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Announced, Republican for U.S. House - District 2
Primary Aug. 5, 2014

Social

2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 70%
2013-2014 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score (Jan. 13, 2014) 20%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Lifetime Score 3%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Overall Positions 4%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes 3%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes Lifetime Score 2%
2013 Americans United for the Separation of Church and State - Positions 100%
2013 Bread for the World - Positions 20%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 92%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 92%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 33%
2013 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy 74%
2013 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 16%
2013 National Right to Life Committee - Positions (Jan. 14, 2014) 100%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 70%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 70%
2012 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 0%
2012 Bread for the World - Positions 25%
2012 Catholic Advocate - Positions 100%
2012 Catholic Advocate - Positions 100%
2012 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 8%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2012 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2012 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 7%
2012 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Social) 84%
2012 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 16%
2012 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 16%
2012 Open Doors USA - Positions 50%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 70%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 70%
2011-2012 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 96%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 96%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 79%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 2%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 13%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 77%
2011-2012 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2011 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 0%
2011 Americans United for the Separation of Church and State - Positions (House Only) 0%
2011 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 10%
2011 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2011 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 96%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 96%
2011 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 0%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 53%
2011 Family Research Council - Positions 90%
2011 Family Research Council - Positions 90%
2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 100%
2011 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 100%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 0%
2011 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2011 Secular Coalition for America - Congressional Positions 14%
2011 The Children's Health Fund - Positions (House Only) 0%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 80%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 80%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 80%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 80%
2010 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 0%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2010 Liberty Central - Positions on Conservative Issues A
2010 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 85%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 0%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 90%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 90%
2010 Vote Kids - Positions 23%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 American Family Association - Positions 88%
2009-2010 American Family Association - Positions 88%
2009-2010 American Immigration Lawyers Association - U.S. House Score 0%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 91%
2009-2010 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 95%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 95%
2009-2010 Family Research Council - Positions 87%
2009-2010 Family Research Council - Positions 87%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 48
2009-2010 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 83%
2009-2010 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 0%
2009-2010 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 0%
2009-2010 St. Joseph Health System - Positions 0%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 87%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 80%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 87%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 80%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 88%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 88%
2009 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 5%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 90%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 95%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 88%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 88%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 3%
2009 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 25%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 24%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 73%
2009 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 75%
2009 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 8%
2009 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 8%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 85%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 92%
2009 The Children's Health Fund - Positions 0%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 90%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 90%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 90%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 90%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 90%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 90%
2009 Vote Kids - Positions 23%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top