Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Phil Gingrey's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Animals and Wildlife

Office: U.S. House (GA) - District 11, Republican

Animals and Wildlife

2014 American Veterinary Medical Association - Positions on Professional Advocacy 100%
2013 American Veterinary Medical Association - Positions on Professional Advocacy 0%
2013 Animal Welfare Institute - Compassion Index 0%
2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 33%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 31%
2013 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 33%
2012 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean water (House Only) 0%
2012 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 21%
2011-2012 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 0%
2011 American Veterinary Medical Association - Positions on Professional Advocacy 67%
2011 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean Water (House Only) 0%
2011 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 0%
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2010 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 50%
2009-2010 Big Cat Rescue - House of Representatives Score 0%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2009-2010 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 13%
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2009 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 0%
2008 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 100
2007-2008 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 0%
2007-2008 Big Cat Rescue - Positions 33
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2007-2008 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions on Animal Protection 17%
2007-2008 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 17
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2007 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions on Animal Protection 17
2006 National Animal Interest Alliance Trust - Positions 100%
2006 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 100%
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2005-2006 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 0%
2005-2006 Big Cat Rescue - Positions 50%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2005-2006 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 28
2005-2006 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 28%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2005 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 0%
2004 American Humane Association - Positions 0%
2004 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 0%
2004 Born Free USA - Positions 0%
2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2004 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 100%
2004 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 0
2004 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 0
2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2003 American Humane Association - Positions 0%
2003 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 0%
2003 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 0%
2003 Born Free USA - Positions 0%
2003 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2003 Doris Day Animal League - Positions 0%
2003 Sierra Club - Positions 0%
2003 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 0%
2003 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top