or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

George S. LeMieux

George S. LeMieux's Ratings and Endorsements

Full Name: George S. LeMieux

Campaign Finance and Elections

2009-2010 Arab American Institute - Positions 33%

Conservative

2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 89%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 92%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2010 FreedomWorks - Positions 78%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 32%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 74%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 72%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 77%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 67%
2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 88%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 90%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 90%
2009-2010 American Family Association - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 94%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 94%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2009-2010 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2009-2010 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 93%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 88%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 87%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 87%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 90%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 90%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 88%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 86%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 86%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 40
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2009 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 80%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 80%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 80%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 80%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 100%

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

2009-2010 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 0%

Social

2010 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 5%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2010 Liberty Central - Positions on Conservative Issues A
2010 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 21%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 74%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 90%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 90%
2010 Vote Kids - Positions 0%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 33%
2009-2010 American Family Association - Positions 100%
2009-2010 American Family Association - Positions 100%
2009-2010 American Immigration Lawyers Association - U.S. Senate Score 0%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 50%
2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 41
2009-2010 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2009-2010 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 14%
2009-2010 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 14%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 90%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 88%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 88%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 87%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 87%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 90%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 8%
2009 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2009 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 25%
2009 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 25%
2009 The Children's Health Fund - Positions 0%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 80%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 80%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 80%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 80%
2009 Vote Kids - Positions 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top