Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

John 'Johnny' H. Isakson's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Foreign Affairs

Office: U.S. Senate (GA) - Jr, Republican

Foreign Affairs

2014 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 0%
2014 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 33%
2014 Peace Action West - Positions (June 3, 2014) 0%
2013 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 0%
2013 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 66%
2013 Peace Action West - Positions (Nov. 20, 2013) 0%
2012 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 13%
2012 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions 46%
2012 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 17%
2012 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2012 National Journal - Senate Conservative (Foreign) 77%
2012 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2011-2012 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2011-2012 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2011-2012 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 50%
2011-2012 USA Engage - Positions 63%
2011 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2011 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 14%
2011 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 18%
2011 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 60%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 37%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 61%
2011 Peace Action West - Positions 11%
2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 90%
2010 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score F
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 66%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 33%
2010 Peace Action - Positions 38%
2010 Peace Action West - Positions 38%
2009-2012 Council for a Livable World - Positions (Senate) 17%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 22%
2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -8%
2009-2010 USA Engage - Positions 50%
2009-2010 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 25%
2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2009 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2009 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 80%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 16%
2009 Peace Action West - Positions 0%
2009 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score 75%
2008 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions on Armenian American Issues C-
2008 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score F
2008 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 25%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 16%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 79%
2008 Peace Action West - Positions 20%
2008 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Iraq-Afghanistan Supplemental Spending Score 33%
2007-2009 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score F
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0%
2007-2008 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 17%
2007-2008 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2007-2008 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2007-2008 USA Engage - Positions on Trade and Engagement D
2007-2008 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions -3
2007 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score D-
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0%
2007 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2007 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 16%
2007 Peace Action West - Positions 0%
2007 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -1
2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur B
2007 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Positions on Iraq War Amendments 50%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 100%
2006 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score D+
2006 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 82%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 16%
2006 Peace Action - Positions 33%
2006 Peace Action West - Positions 33%
2006 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur C
2006 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 33%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 83%
2005-2006 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0%
2005-2006 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 8%
2005-2006 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 50%
2005-2006 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2005 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score D
2005 Latin America Working Group - Positions 25%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 74%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2005 Peace Action - Positions 11%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 13%
2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2004 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0%
2004 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 33%
2004 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2003-2004 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -10
2003-2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2003-2004 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -4
2003-2004 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 38%
2003 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 11%
2003 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2003 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2003 Peace Action - Positions 11%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2002-2003 Citizens for Global Solutions - Positions 12%
2002 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 75%
2002 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2001-2002 American Foreign Service Association - Positions 88%
2001-2002 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -2
2001-2002 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0%
2001-2002 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2001 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 14%
2001 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2001 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 100%
2000 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 18%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 78%
2000 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 12%
2000 Peace Action - Positions 0%
1999-2000 PeacePAC - Positions 14%
1999 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 29%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 64%
1999 Peace Action - Positions 18%
1998-2002 Center for Security Policy - Positions 85%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top