Representative John B. Larson's Special Interest Group Ratings

Biographical

Full Name: John B. Larson
Current Office: U.S. House - District 1, Democratic
First Elected: 11/03/1998
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
Gender: Male
Family: Wife: Leslie; 3 Children: Carolyn, Laura, Raymond
Birth Date: 07/22/1948
Birth Place: Hartford, CT
Home City: East Hartford, CT
Religion: Roman Catholic
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Social

2012 Catholic Advocate - Positions 0% 2012 Family Research Council - Positions 0% 2012 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 91% 2011 Family Research Council - Positions 10% 2011 Secular Coalition for America - Positions 57% 2010 Liberty Central - Positions on Conservative Issues F 2010 National Association of Social Workers - House of Representatives Score 100% 2009-2010 Family Research Council - Positions 0% 2009-2010 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100% 2009 National Association of Social Workers - Positions 100% 2009 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100% 2009 Population Connection - Committee Votes Score 100% 2008-2011 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 43% 2008 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions on Middle Class Advocacy 90 2008 National Association of Social Workers - Positions 40% 2008 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100% 2007-2010 National Latino Congreso/William C. Velásquez Institute - Positions 83% 2007-2008 Population Action International - Positions 100% 2007 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions on Middle Class Advocacy 90 2007 National Association of Social Workers - Positions 100% 2007 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions on Social Justice and Peace 65 2007 Population Connection - Positions on Population Stabilization 100% 2006 National Association of Social Workers - Positions on Professional Advocacy 80 2006 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100% 2006 Population Connection - Positions 100% 2006 Secular Coalition for America - Positions 80% 2005-2006 Population Action International - Positions on Reproductive Health 100% 2005 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 88% 2005 Hope for Peace and Justice - Positions 100 2005 National Association of Social Workers - Positions on Professional Advocacy 75 2005 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100% 2005 Population Connection - Positions 100% 2005 The Population Institute - Positions 100% 2004 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 86% 2004 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100% 2003-2004 Population Action International - Positions 100% 2003-2004 Population Connection - Positions 86% 2003 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 100% 2003 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100% 2003 Population Action International - Positions 100% 2003 Population Connection - Positions 100% 2003 The Population Institute - Positions 100% 2002 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 33% 2002 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 88% 2002 Population Connection - Positions 100% 2001-2002 National Association of Social Workers - Positions 100% 2001 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 50% 2001 National Youth Advocacy Coalition - Positions 66% 2001 Population Connection - Positions 100% 2000 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 67% 2000 Population Connection - Positions 100% 1999-2000 National Association of Social Workers - Positions 90% 1999 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 78% 1999 Population Connection - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.