Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Clement 'Butch' Leroy Otter's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: Governor (ID), Republican

Conservative

2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 95%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 70%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 93%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 8
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 93%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 54%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 48%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 59%
2005 The John Birch Society - Positions 50%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 93%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 94%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 48%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 80%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring) 63%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 97%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 95%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 88%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 95%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 92%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 96%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 62%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 48%
2003 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer) 50%
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 87%
2002 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 71%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 51%
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 55%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 92%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 93%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 69%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 75%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top