Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Mazie K. Hirono's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Animals and Wildlife

Office: U.S. Senate (HI) - Jr, Democratic

2012 Endorsements

Animals and Wildlife

2014 American Veterinary Medical Assoctiation - Positions on Professional Advocacy 100%
2013 American Veterinary Medical Assoctiation - Positions on Professional Advocacy 100%
2013 Animal Welfare Institute - Compassion Index 0%
2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 83%
2013 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 50%
2012 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean water (House Only) 100%
2012 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 71%
2011-2012 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 72%
2011 American Veterinary Medical Assoctiation - Positions on Professional Advocacy 67%
2011 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean Water (House Only) 100%
2011 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 75%
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2010 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 100%
2009-2010 Big Cat Rescue - House of Representatives Score 100%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2009-2010 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 93%
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2009 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 92%
2008 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 0
2007-2008 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 100%
2007-2008 Big Cat Rescue - Positions 66
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 93%
2007-2008 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions on Animal Protection 100%
2007-2008 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 100
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 90%
2007 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions on Animal Protection 100

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top