Senator Mazie K. Hirono's Special Interest Group Ratings

Biographical

Full Name: Mazie K. Hirono
Current Office: U.S. Senate - Jr, Democratic
First Elected: 11/06/2012
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2018
Gender: Female
Family: Husband: Leighton Kim Oshima; 1 Stepchild: Malia
Birth Date: 11/03/1947
Birth Place: Fukushima, Japan
Home City: Honolulu, HI
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Conservative

2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 0% 2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 1% 2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 9% 2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 1% 2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 0% 2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 3% 2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 38% 2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 0% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 20% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 92% 2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 9% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 84% 2011 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 91% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 80% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 8% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 12% 2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 4% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 11% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 16% 2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 16% 2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 1% 2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 0% 2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 22% 2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 9% 2010 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 89% 2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 84% 2010 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 91% 2010 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 0% 2010 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 90% 2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 11% 2010 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 7% 2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 0% 2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 10% 2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0% 2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0% 2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0% 2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 4% 2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 10% 2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 8% 2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 1% 2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 0% 2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0% 2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 5% 2009 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 29% 2009 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 0% 2009 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 85% 2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 9% 2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 15% 2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 14% 2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 0% 2009 The Club for Growth - Positions 0% 2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 5% 2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 0% 2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 10% 2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 4% 2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 30% 2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 17% 2008 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 0% 2008 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 0% 2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 12% 2008 The Club for Growth - Positions 0% 2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0% 2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 0 2007-2008 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0% 2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 13% 2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 20% 2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 0% 2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0% 2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 5% 2007 GOPUSA - Positions 0% 2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 12.7% 2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 8% 2007 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 0% 2007 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 17% 2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 6% 2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 36% 2007 The Club for Growth - Positions 0% 2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 30% 2007 Traditional Values Coalition - Positions 0 2005-2006 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Conservative Action Score 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.