Senator Mazie K. Hirono's Special Interest Group Ratings

Biographical

Full Name: Mazie K. Hirono
Current Office: U.S. Senate - Jr, Democratic
First Elected: 11/06/2012
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2018
Gender: Female
Family: Husband: Leighton Kim Oshima; 1 Stepchild: Malia
Birth Date: 11/03/1947
Birth Place: Fukushima, Japan
Home City: Honolulu, HI
Religion: Buddhist
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Business and Consumers

2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Taxes) 40% 2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores 44% 2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Other) 50% 2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Positions 57% 2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Labor) 11% 2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Environment) 0% 2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Infrastructure) 85% 2013-2014 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 100% 2013-2014 National Retail Federation - Positions: Other (Senate Only) 100% 2013-2014 National Retail Federation - Positions: Labor 0% 2013-2014 National Retail Federation - Positions: Budget/Tax 100% 2013-2014 National Small Business Association - Positions 100 2013-2014 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 83 2013 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 44% 2013 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 0% 2013 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 66% 2013 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 38% 2013 United States Chamber of Commerce - Lifetime Score 33% 2012 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions of 112th Congress 14% 2012 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 50% 2012 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 30% 2012 United States Chamber of Commerce - Lifetime Score 33% 2011-2012 American Council of Engineering Companies - Positions 69 2011-2012 Independent Electrical Contractors - Positions (House) 0% 2011-2012 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 0 2011-2012 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 12% 2011-2012 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 0% 2011-2012 National Retail Federation - Positions: International Trade 0% 2011-2012 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 25% 2011-2012 Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors-National Association - Positions 20% 2011-2012 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 21% 2011 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions (House Only) 100% 2011 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 0% 2011 National Retail Federation - Positions 0% 2011 National Small Business Association - Positions 50% 2011 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 25% 2011 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 0% 2011 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 19% 2010 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 25% 2010 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 13% 2009-2010 American Council of Engineering Companies - Positions 89% 2009-2010 Associated General Contractors of America - Positions 37% 2009-2010 Independent Electrical Contractors - Positions 0% 2009-2010 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 20% 2009-2010 National Association for the Self-Employed - U.S. House Score 100% 2009-2010 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 33% 2009-2010 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 29% 2009-2010 National Retail Federation - Positions 0% 2009-2010 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 55% 2009-2010 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 0% 2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 5% 2009 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 20% 2009 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 33% 2008 Business-Industry Political Action Committee - Positions 10% 2008 United States Chamber of Commerce - Lifetime Score 51% 2008 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 56% 2007-2008 American Council of Engineering Companies - Positions 58% 2007-2008 American Forest and Paper Association - Forest Products Advocacy Score 33% 2007-2008 Associated Builders & Contractors - Positions 0% 2007-2008 Associated General Contractors of America - Positions 62% 2007-2008 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 10% 2007-2008 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 20% 2007-2008 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 60 2007-2008 National Restaurant Association - Positions on Restaurant Advocacy 40 2007-2008 National Retail Federation - Positions Retail Industry Advocacy 20% 2007-2008 National Small Business Association - Positions 69% 2007-2008 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 70% 2007-2008 Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors-National Association - Positions 70% 2007 Business-Industry Political Action Committee - Positions 0% 2007 TechAmerica - Positions 75% 2007 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 0% 2007 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 45%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.