Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Anthony 'Tony' Strickland's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2011 California Communities United Institute - Positions 46
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Civil Liberties Score 80%
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Overall Score 72%
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Economic Liberties Score 63%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Overall Score 41%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Positions on AIDS Policy 8%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Minority Issues Score 23%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Women's Issues Score 46%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Intersex Score 13%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Economic Justice 62%
2009 Applied Research Center - Legal Racism Score 33%
2009 Applied Research Center - Green Equity Score 67%
2009 Applied Research Center - Positions on Education Equity 67%
2009 Applied Research Center - Health Equity Score 40%
2009 Applied Research Center - Overall Score 40%
2009 Applied Research Center - Positions on Criminal Justice 33%
2009 Applied Research Center - Leadership Score 0%
2009 Applied Research Center - Housing and Economics Score 25%
2009 Applied Research Center - Positions on Civil Rights 50%
2008 Equality California - Positions 0%
2004 California Communities United Institute - LGBTI - Positions 0%
2004 Lambda Letters Project - Minority Rights Policy Score 5%
2004 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 27%
2004 Lambda Letters Project - HIV/AIDS Policy Score 0%
2003 California Communities United Institute - Positions 24%
2003 Equality California - Positions 6%
2002 California Communities United Institute - Positions 35%
2002 Equality California - Positions 0%
2001 Equality California - Positions 0%
1997-2003 Gay Rights Information - Positions on LGBT Rights 0%
1997-2001 Gay Rights Information - Positions on LGBT Rights 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top