Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Darrell Issa's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Environment

Office: U.S. House (CA) - District 49, Republican

Environment

2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 17%
2013 Environment America - Positions 0%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 23%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 5%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 5%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 6%
2012 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean water (House Only) 0%
2011-2012 Clean Water Action - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 3%
2011-2012 Environment America - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 29%
2011-2012 League of Conservation Voters - Session Score 7%
2011-2012 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions (House Only) 29%
2011 Clean Water Action California - Positions (Congressional) 0%
2011 Environment America - Positions 0%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 5%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 9%
2011 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean Water (House Only) 0%
2011 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions (House Only) 0
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 5%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 4%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2009-2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 4%
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 17
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2009 Environment America - Positions 7%
2009 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 7%
2008 Environment America - Positions 0%
2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions 8
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 7%
2007-2008 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 3%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 7
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2007 League of Conservation Voters - First Session Score 0%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 86%
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 17
2006 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2006 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 0%
2005-2006 American Forest and Paper Association - Positions 100%
2005-2006 American Lands Alliance - Positions 0%
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2005-2006 Partnership for America - Positions 100%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 8
2005 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 6%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 0%
2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2003-2004 American Lands Alliance - Positions 0%
2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2003-2004 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 6%
2003-2004 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 34%
2003-2004 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 8%
2003 American Lands Alliance - Positions 0%
2003 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2003 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 10%
2003 Sierra Club - Positions 0%
2002 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 33%
2001-2002 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2001-2002 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 5%
2001-2002 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 8%
2001 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top