Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Judy M. Chu's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Women

Office: U.S. House (CA) - District 27, Democratic

Women

2014 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Positions (House Only) 0
2013 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Positions (House Only) 0
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2013 Federally Employed Women - Positions 100%
2013 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2013 Young Women's Christian Association (YWCA) - Positions 66%
2012 Federally Employed Women - Positions 100%
2012 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2011-2012 American Association of University Women - Positions 100
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 3%
2011 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Positions (House Only) 100%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 3%
2011 Federally Employed Women - Positions 100%
2011 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2011 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions (House Only) 85
2010 Federally Employed Women - Positions 50%
2010 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 American Association of University Women - Positions 83%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 5%
2009 American Association of University Women - Positions 75%
2009 Federally Employed Women - Positions 40%
2009 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2006 California National Organization for Women - Positions on Women's Rights 100
2006 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 100
2005 American Association of University Women of California - Positions 100%
2005 California National Organization for Women - Positions 100%
2005 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 100%
2004 California National Organization for Women - Positions 100%
2004 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 100%
2003 American Association of University Women of California - Positions 100%
2003 California National Organization for Women - Positions 100%
2002 American Association of University Women of California - Positions 100%
2002 California National Organization for Women - Positions 96%
2001 American Association of University Women of California - Positions 88%
2001 California National Organization for Women - Positions on Women's Rights 100

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top