or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Judy M. Chu

Judy M. Chu's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Government Operations

Full Name: Judy M. Chu
Current Office: U.S. House - District 27, Democratic
First Elected: 07/14/2009
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. House - District 27
General Nov. 4, 2014
Primary June 3, 2014

Government Operations

2013 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2013 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 100%
2013 Bread for the World - Positions 80%
2013 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 6%
2013 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 6%
2013 FreedomWorks - Positions 33%
2013 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 89%
2013 The Club for Growth - Positions (lifetime) 8%
2013 The Club for Growth - Positions 18%
2012 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 100%
2012 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2012 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2012 FreedomWorks - Positions 16%
2012 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 15%
2012 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 15%
2012 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 100%
2012 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 95%
2011 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2011 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 7%
2011 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 7%
2011 FreedomWorks - Positions 5%
2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 13%
2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 13%
2011 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 100%
2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 13%
2010 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 0%
2010 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 0%
2010 FreedomWorks - Positions 6%
2010 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 94%
2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 0%
2009-2010 American Immigration Lawyers Association - U.S. House Score 100%
2009-2010 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2009 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 100%
2009 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2009 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 0%
2009 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 0%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 0%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 0%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 0%
2009 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2009 The Club for Growth - Positions 0%
2006 California Taxpayers' Association - Positions on Tax and Fiscal Policy 18
2006 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association - Positions on Tax Reduction 19.4
2005 California Taxpayers' Association - Positions 20%
2005 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association - Positions 11
2004 California Taxpayers' Association - Positions 9%
2004 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association - Positions 5
2003 California Taxpayers' Association - Positions 5%
2003 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association - Positions 3
2002 California Taxpayers' Association - Positions 10%
2001-2002 National Tax-Limitation Committee - Positions 21%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top