or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Richard Blumenthal

Richard Blumenthal's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Social

Full Name: Richard Blumenthal
Current Office: U.S. Senate - Sr, Democratic
First Elected: 11/02/2010
Last Elected: 11/02/2010
Next Election: 2016

Social

2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 3%
2013-2014 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score (Jan. 13, 2014) 88%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Overall Positions 99%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes Lifetime Score 94%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Lifetime Score 98%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes 96%
2013 Americans United for the Separation of Church and State - Positions 0%
2013 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2013 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy 0%
2013 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 73%
2013 National Right to Life Committee - Positions (Jan. 14, 2014) 0%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 10%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 10%
2012 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90%
2012 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2012 Catholic Advocate - Positions 0%
2012 Catholic Advocate - Positions 0%
2012 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 100%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2012 Family Research Council - Positions 0%
2012 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 67%
2012 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2012 National Journal - Senate Liberal (Social) 64%
2012 National Journal - Senate Conservative (Social) 0%
2012 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 91%
2012 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 91%
2012 Open Doors USA - Positions 50%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 14%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 14%
2011-2012 ACT! for America - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 1%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 66%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 56%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 25%
2011-2012 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0%
2011 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2011 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 100%
2011 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 13%
2011 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 13%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2011 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 79%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 20%
2011 Family Research Council - Positions 0%
2011 Family Research Council - Positions 0%
2011 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 52%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 48%
2011 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 22%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 25%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 22%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 25%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top