Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Michael 'Mike' Coffman's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: U.S. House (CO) - District 6, Republican

Conservative

2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 97%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score (June 23, 2014) 97%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 100%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (June 23, 2014) 100%
2014 Conservative Review - Positions 72
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 65%
2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 75%
2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 75%
2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 71%
2013-2014 Faith and Freedom Coalition - Positions 91
2013-2014 The New American - Positions (captured September 2, 2014) 73%
2013 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
2013 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 93%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 92%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 33%
2013 National Journal - Conservative (Composite) 61%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 52%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy 66%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 70%
2013 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 75
2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 95%
2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 92%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Foreign) 73%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Composite Score) 80%
2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 74%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 70%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 91%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 97%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 79%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 96%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 76%
2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 100%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 83%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 91%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 75%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 70%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 75%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 96%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 88%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 68%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 74%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 90%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 91%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 95%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 77%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 80%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 80%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 92%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 92%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 90%
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 14
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 95%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 75%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 83%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 75%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 60%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 90%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top