Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Gilbert 'Gil' A. Cedillo's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Women

Office: Council Member (Los Angeles, CA) - District 1, Democratic

Women

2010 California Communities United Institute - Women's Issues Score 96%
2009 California National Organization for Women - State Senate Score 77%
2007 California National Organization for Women - Positions on Women's Rights 95
2007 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 100
2006 California National Organization for Women - Positions on Women's Rights 75
2006 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 90
2005 American Association of University Women of California - Positions 67%
2005 California National Organization for Women - Positions 80%
2005 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 93%
2004 California National Organization for Women - Positions 88%
2004 Lambda Letters Project - Women's Issues Score 95%
2003 American Association of University Women of California - Positions 90%
2003 California National Organization for Women - Positions 96%
2002 American Association of University Women of California - Positions 87%
2002 California National Organization for Women - Positions 68%
2001 American Association of University Women of California - Positions 69%
2001 California National Organization for Women - Positions on Women's Rights 76
2000 American Association of University Women of California - Positions 94%
2000 California National Organization for Women - Positions on Women's Rights 93
1999 California National Organization for Women - Positions on Women's Rights 96
1998 American Association of University Women of California - Positions 100%
1998 California National Organization for Women - Positions on Women's Rights 88

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top