or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Mary Whitaker Bono Mack

Mary Whitaker Bono Mack's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Animals and Wildlife

Full Name: Mary Whitaker Bono Mack

Animals and Wildlife

2012 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean water (House Only) 0%
2012 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 25%
2012 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 45%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 10%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 29%
2011 American Veterinary Medical Assoctiation - Positions on Professional Advocacy 50%
2011 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean Water (House Only) 0%
2011 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 50%
2010 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 100%
2009-2010 Big Cat Rescue - House of Representatives Score 100%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 57%
2009-2010 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 80%
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 69
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 60%
2009 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 85%
2008 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 0
2007-2008 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 66%
2007-2008 Big Cat Rescue - Positions 66
2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions 42
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 40%
2007-2008 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions on Animal Protection 92%
2007-2008 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 92
2007-2008 The National Mining Association - Positions 83%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 37
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 30%
2007 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions on Animal Protection 100
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 38
2006 National Animal Interest Alliance Trust - Positions 0%
2006 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 0%
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2005-2006 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 100%
2005-2006 Big Cat Rescue - Positions 75%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 10%
2005-2006 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 85
2005-2006 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 85%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 17
2005 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 50%
2004 American Humane Association - Positions 33%
2004 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 33%
2004 Born Free USA - Positions 33%
2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 20%
2004 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 25%
2004 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 33
2004 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 33
2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2003 American Humane Association - Positions 33%
2003 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 33%
2003 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 33%
2003 Born Free USA - Positions 33%
2003 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 20%
2003 Doris Day Animal League - Positions 33%
2003 Sierra Club - Positions 14%
2003 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 33%
2003 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 33%
2002 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 0%
2001-2002 American Humane Association - Positions 50%
2001-2002 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 50%
2001-2002 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 50%
2001-2002 Born Free USA - Positions 50%
2001-2002 Doris Day Animal League - Positions 50%
2001-2002 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 50%
2001-2002 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 50%
2000 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 33%
2000 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 25
1999-2000 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 25%
1999 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 33%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top