or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Mary Whitaker Bono Mack

Mary Whitaker Bono Mack's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Foreign Affairs

Full Name: Mary Whitaker Bono Mack

Foreign Affairs

2012 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2012 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 0%
2012 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions 38%
2012 Bread for the World - Positions 0%
2012 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 33%
2012 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 7%
2012 National Journal - House Liberal (Foreign) 20%
2012 Peace Action - Positions 4%
2011-2012 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2011-2012 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 8%
2011-2012 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 56%
2011-2012 USA Engage - Positions 63%
2011 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 0%
2011 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 27%
2011 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 68%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 31%
2011 Peace Action West - Positions 13%
2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 90%
2010 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score C-
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 32%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 67%
2010 Peace Action - Positions 13%
2010 Peace Action West - Positions 13%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 90%
2009-2010 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 0%
2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -5%
2009-2010 USA Engage - Positions 60%
2009-2010 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 10%
2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2009 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 25%
2009 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 75%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2009 NewPolicy.org - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy 0%
2009 Peace Action West - Positions 8%
2009 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score 25%
2009 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3%
2008 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions on Armenian American Issues B
2008 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score C-
2008 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 69%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 31%
2008 Peace Action West - Positions 0%
2007-2009 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score C-
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0%
2007-2008 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 50%
2007-2008 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2007-2008 Population Action International - Positions 100%
2007-2008 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -5
2007-2008 USA Engage - Positions on Trade and Engagement B
2007-2008 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions +1
2007 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score D-
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 21%
2007 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 27%
2007 Latin America Working Group - Positions 20%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 36%
2007 Peace Action West - Positions 9%
2007 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3
2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur C
2007 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Iraq-Afghanistan Supplemental Spending Score 17%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 86%
2006 Church World Service - Positions 33
2006 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score C-
2006 Latin America Working Group - Positions 22%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 70%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 29%
2006 Peace Action - Positions 8%
2006 Peace Action West - Positions 8%
2006 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur D
2006 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 38%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 15%
2005-2006 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 50%
2005-2006 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 8%
2005-2006 Population Action International - Positions on Reproductive Health 100%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -8
2005 Church World Service - Positions 25
2005 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score B-
2005 Council on American-Islamic Relations - Positions 0%
2005 Latin America Working Group - Positions 25%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 45%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 55%
2005 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 0%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 100%
2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2004 Latin America Working Group - Positions 43%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 50%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 50%
2004 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 33%
2004 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 87.5%
2003-2004 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -3
2003-2004 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Bread for the World - Positions 75%
2003-2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 27%
2003-2004 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 83%
2003-2004 PeacePAC - Positions 45%
2003-2004 Population Action International - Positions 0%
2003-2004 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -4
2003-2004 USA Engage - Positions 60%
2003-2004 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 63%
2003 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2003 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 38%
2003 Latin America Working Group - Positions 22%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 57%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 42%
2003 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2003 Peace Action - Positions 33%
2003 Population Action International - Positions 0%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2002-2003 Citizens for Global Solutions - Positions 44%
2002 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 75%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 56%
2002 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2001-2002 American Foreign Service Association - Positions 78%
2001-2002 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -2
2001-2002 Bread for the World - Positions 67%
2001-2002 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0%
2001-2002 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 7%
2001-2002 National Foreign Trade Council - Postions 83%
2001-2002 USA Engage - Positions 80%
2001 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 21%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 49%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 47%
2001 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2001 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 100%
2000 Bread for the World - Positions 0%
2000 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 27%
2000 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 83%
2000 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 39%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 57%
2000 Peace Action - Positions 0%
1999-2000 PeacePAC - Positions 29%
1999 Bread for the World - Positions 0%
1999 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
1999 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 50%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 55%
1999 Peace Action - Positions 27%
1998-2002 Center for Security Policy - Positions 76%
1998 Bread for the World - Positions 67%
1998 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 5%
1998 National Journal - Liberal on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 0%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 93%
1998 Peace Action - Positions 13%
1997-1998 PeacePAC - Positions 0%
1997 Center for Security Policy - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top