or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Mary Whitaker Bono Mack

Mary Whitaker Bono Mack's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

Full Name: Mary Whitaker Bono Mack

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2012 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 0%
2012 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 0%
2012 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 7%
2012 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Total Score 10%
2012 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions on Civil Rights 10%
2011-2012 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 30%
2011-2012 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 45%
2011-2012 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 56%
2011 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions (House Only) 20%
2011 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 0%
2011 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) 15%
2010 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 20%
2009-2010 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 19%
2009-2010 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 53%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 30%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 15%
2009-2010 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 12%
2009-2010 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 35%
2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -5%
2009 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 30%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 48%
2009 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 44%
2009 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3%
2008 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 40%
2008 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions on Middle Class Advocacy 56
2007-2008 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 27%
2007-2008 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 55%
2007-2008 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions on Civil and Human 17
2007-2008 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions on Civil Rights and Social Justice Issues 48%
2007-2008 National Organization for Women - Positions 64%
2007-2008 The Arc - Positions 14%
2007-2008 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -5
2007 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 17
2007 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 30%
2007 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions on Middle Class Advocacy 50
2007 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 33%
2007 League of Women Voters - Civil Liberties and Civil Rights Score 0%
2007 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 44%
2007 National Council of La Raza - Positions 0
2007 PFLAG, Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays - Positions 100%
2007 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3
2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur C
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 86%
2006 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 25%
2006 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 30%
2006 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur D
2005-2006 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 29%
2005-2006 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 75%
2005-2006 Iranian American Political Action Committee - Positions 0%
2005-2006 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 36%
2005-2006 National Organization for Women - Positions 32%
2005-2006 The Arc - Positions 33%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -8
2005 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 15%
2005 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 0%
2005 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 11%
2005 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 30%
2005 National Council of La Raza - Positions 0%
2005 National Organization for Women - Positions 29%
2004 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 35%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 100%
2004 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 0%
2004 National Council of La Raza - Positions 100%
2003-2004 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 25%
2003-2004 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 66%
2003-2004 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 26%
2003-2004 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 28%
2003-2004 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 40%
2003-2004 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -4
2003 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 10%
2003 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 50%
2003 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 11%
2003 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 30%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2001-2002 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 27%
2001-2002 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 67%
2001-2002 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 17%
2001-2002 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 17%
2001-2002 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 28%
2001-2002 People for the American Way - Positions 18%
2001 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 33%
2001 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 67%
2001 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 9%
2001 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 21%
2000 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 36%
2000 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 30%
2000 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 40%
1999-2000 Common Cause - Lifetime Score 0%
1999-2000 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 20%
1999-2000 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 25%
1999 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 38%
1999 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 9%
1999 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 27%
1998 National Organization for Women - Positions 18%
1997-1998 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 25%
1997-1998 Campaign for a Color Blind America - Positions 100%
1997-1998 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 25%
1997-1998 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 8%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top