Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Bob Gunther's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: State House (MN) - 23A, Republican

2014 Endorsements

Abortion

2014 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions [Excused and Present not counted] 100%
2014 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0%
2013 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0%
2012 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions [Factoring excused and no-votes] 100%
2012 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions [Excused and no-votes not counted] 100%
2012 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0%
2011 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 90%
2010 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions on Reproductive Rights 0%
2009 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100%
2008 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions on Pro-Life Policy 100
2008 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions on Reproductive Rights 0
2007 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100
2007 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions on Reproductive Rights 0
2006 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100%
2006 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0%
2005 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100%
2005 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0%
2004 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100%
2004 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0%
2003 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100%
2003 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0%
2002 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100%
2001 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 92%
2001 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 17%
2000 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100%
1999 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 40%
1999 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 67%
1998 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 88%
1998 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0%
1998 Planned Parenthood of Minnesota Advocate - Positions 0%
1996 Planned Parenthood of Minnesota Advocate - Positions on Reproductive Rights 0%

Agriculture and Food

2001-2002 Minnesota Farm Bureau - Positions 100%

Business and Consumers

2015 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100%
2014 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100%
2013-2014 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions %
2013 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 88%
2012 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2010 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2009 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 92%
2008 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 83
2007-2008 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions on Pro-Small Business Policy 89
2007 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 83
2006 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 75%
2005-2006 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 88%
2005 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100%
2004 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 82%
2003-2004 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 90%
2002 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 82%
2001-2002 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 93%
2001 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions (Labor Policy) 100%
2001 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions (Energy Policy) 100%
2001 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions (Environmental Policy) 50%
2001 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions (Healthcare Policy) 100%
2001 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100%
1999-2000 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 94%
1997-1998 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 73%

Labor Unions

2015 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 53
2015 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Lifetime Score 36
2014 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 40%
2014 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions on Nursing, Health Care, and Workforce Issues 32%
2013-2014 SEIU Minnesota State Council - Positions (House) 32%
2013 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 0%
2013 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 31%
2013 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 23%
2013 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions on Nursing, Health Care, and Workforce Issues 14%
2012 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 0%
2012 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions on Nursing, Health Care, and Workforce Issues 25%
2011 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 23%
2011 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions 33%
2010 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 20%
2010 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Lifetime Score 38%
2010 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 38%
2010 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions 32%
2009 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 0%
2009 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 22%
2009 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 25%
2008 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions on Workplace Rights 20
2008 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 20
2008 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions on Workplace Rights 54
2007 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions on Workplace Rights 20
2007 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions on Workplace Rights 33
2006 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 20%
2006 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 40%
2005 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 0%
2005 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 12%
2004 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 60%
2004 AFSCME Joint Councils 6, 14, 65, & 96, AFL-CIO - Positions 40%
2004 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 17%
2004 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 40%
2003 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 40%
2003 AFSCME Joint Councils 6, 14, 65, & 96, AFL-CIO - Positions 0%
2003 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 19%
2001 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 14%
2001 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions (Labor Policy) 100%
2000 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 23%
1999 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 18%
1998 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 31%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top