Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

James 'Doc' P. Pilliod's Ratings and Endorsements

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

1999-2001 Gay Rights Information - Positions on LGBT Rights 0%

Socially Conservative

2011-2012 Cornerstone Policy Research - Fiscal Score 83
2011-2012 Cornerstone Policy Research - Constitutional Score 50
2011-2012 Cornerstone Policy Research - Life Score 67
2011-2012 Cornerstone Policy Research - Life Score 67
2011-2012 Cornerstone Policy Research - Constitutional Score 50
2011-2012 Cornerstone Policy Research - Fiscal Score 83
2011-2012 Cornerstone Policy Research - Positions 59
2011-2012 Cornerstone Policy Research - Positions 59
2011-2012 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Interim Score (House Only) 66
2011-2012 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Interim Score (House Only) 66
2011-2012 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions (House Only) 65
2011-2012 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions (House Only) 65
2011-2012 Republican Liberty Caucus of New Hampshire - Positions 60%
2011-2012 Republican Liberty Caucus of New Hampshire - Positions 60%
2010 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions 44%
2010 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions 44%
2009 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions 41%
2009 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions 41%
2007-2008 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions 35
2007-2008 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions 35
2007 Cornerstone Policy Research - Positions 0%
2007 Cornerstone Policy Research - Positions 0%
2007 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions on Republican Principles 26
2007 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions on Republican Principles 26
2006 Cornerstone Policy Research - Positions 18%
2006 Cornerstone Policy Research - Positions 18%
2005-2006 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions 44%
2005-2006 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions 44%
2004 Cornerstone Policy Research - Positions 0%
2004 Cornerstone Policy Research - Positions 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top