or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Ann Marie Buerkle

Ann Marie Buerkle's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Conservative

Full Name: Ann Marie Buerkle

Conservative

2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 98%
2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 96%
2012 Catholic Advocate - Positions 100%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2012 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2012 FreedomWorks - Positions 63%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Economic) 95%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Foreign) 84%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Composite Score) 87%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Social) 80%
2012 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 83%
2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 79%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 69%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 69%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 90%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 90%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 90%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 90%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 74%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 74%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 74%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 16%
2011-2012 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 100%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2011 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 76%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 76%
2011 Family Research Council - Positions 90%
2011 FreedomWorks - Positions 87%
2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 95%
2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 95%
2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 95%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 100%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 91%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 91%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 90%
2011 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 82%
2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 92%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 80%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 80%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 80%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 80%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 80%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top