Nan Hayworth's Special Interest Group Ratings

Biographical

Full Name: Nan Hayworth
On The Ballot: Running, Independence for U.S. House - District 18
Running, Republican, Conservative for U.S. House - District 18
General Nov. 4, 2014
Primary June 24, 2014
Gender: Female
Family: Husband: Scott; 2 Children: Will, Jack
Birth Date: 12/14/1959
Birth Place: Chicago, IL
Home City: Bedford, NY
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Conservative

2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 64% 2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 56% 2012 Catholic Advocate - Positions 82% 2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 25% 2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 25% 2012 Family Research Council - Positions 16% 2012 FreedomWorks - Positions 20% 2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Economic) 44% 2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Foreign) 59% 2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Composite Score) 52% 2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Social) 48% 2012 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 62% 2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 52% 2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 50% 2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 50% 2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 68% 2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 68% 2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 68% 2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 68% 2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 86% 2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 86% 2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 89% 2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 89% 2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 49% 2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 49% 2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 49% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 31% 2011-2012 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 80% 2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 72% 2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 72% 2011 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 89% 2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 96% 2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 96% 2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 53% 2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 53% 2011 Family Research Council - Positions 70% 2011 FreedomWorks - Positions 69% 2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 86% 2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 86% 2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 86% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 38% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 52% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 60% 2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 53% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 46% 2011 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100% 2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 69% 2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 56% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 60% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 70% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 60% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 70% 2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 60%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.