Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Ron Johnson's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: U.S. Senate (WI) - Sr, Republican

Business and Consumers

2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Environment) 100%
2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Labor) 75%
2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Positions 42%
2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Taxes) 100%
2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Infrastructure) 17%
2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores 56%
2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Other) 0%
2013-2014 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 0%
2013-2014 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 50%
2013-2014 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions (Interim Mid-Year) 55%
2013-2014 National Retail Federation - Positions: Labor 100%
2013-2014 National Retail Federation - Positions: Budget/Tax 0%
2013-2014 National Retail Federation - Positions: Other (Senate Only) 0%
2013-2014 National Small Business Association - Positions 0
2013-2014 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 33
2013 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 60%
2013 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2013 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 66%
2013 United States Chamber of Commerce - Lifetime Score 74%
2013 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 75%
2012 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions of 112th Congress 81%
2012 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 55%
2012 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 75%
2012 United States Chamber of Commerce - Lifetime Score 74%
2011-2012 American Council of Engineering Companies - Positions 56
2011-2012 Independent Electrical Contractors - Positions (Senate) 100%
2011-2012 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 100
2011-2012 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 79%
2011-2012 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2011-2012 National Retail Federation - Positions: International Trade 100%
2011-2012 National Retail Federation - Positions: Labor (Senate) 100%
2011-2012 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 33%
2011-2012 Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors-National Association - Positions 83%
2011-2012 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 95%
2011 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 88%
2011 National Retail Federation - Positions 85%
2011 National Small Business Association - Positions 50%
2011 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 50%
2011 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 50%
2011 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 73%

Conservative

2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 88%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score (June 23, 2014) 93%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 93%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (June 23, 2014) 89%
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 89%
2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 90%
2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 86%
2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 80%
2013-2014 The New American - Positions (captured September 2, 2014) 80%
2013 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 99%
2013 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 75%
2013 National Journal - Conservative (Composite) 90%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 85%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy 91%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 90%
2013 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 90
2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 100%
2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 100%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2012 National Journal - Senate Conservative (Foreign) 92%
2012 National Journal - Senate Conservative (Composite Score) 92%
2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 97%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 85%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 95%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 97%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 94%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 94%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 100%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 91%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 80%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 94%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 94%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 75%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 80%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 75%

Socially Conservative

2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 89%
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 89%
2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 90%
2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 86%
2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 86%
2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 90%
2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 80%
2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 80%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 75%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 75%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy 91%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy 91%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 90%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 90%
2012 Catholic Advocate - Positions 100%
2012 Catholic Advocate - Positions 100%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2012 Family Research Council - Positions 85%
2012 Family Research Council - Positions 85%
2012 National Journal - Senate Conservative (Social) 82%
2012 National Journal - Senate Conservative (Social) 82%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 85%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 85%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 94%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 94%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 94%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 94%
2011-2012 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2011-2012 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2011 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2011 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 91%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 91%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 80%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 80%
2011 Family Research Council - Positions 85%
2011 Family Research Council - Positions 85%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 100%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 100%
2011 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2011 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 75%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 80%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 80%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 75%

Socially Liberal

2013-2014 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score (Jan. 13, 2014) 30%
2013-2014 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score (Jan. 13, 2014) 30%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes Lifetime Score 1%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes Lifetime Score 1%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes 2%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes 2%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Overall Positions 2%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Overall Positions 2%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Lifetime Score 2%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Lifetime Score 2%
2013 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 8%
2013 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 8%
2012 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 0%
2012 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 0%
2012 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2012 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2012 National Journal - Senate Liberal (Social) 15%
2012 National Journal - Senate Liberal (Social) 15%
2012 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 8%
2012 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 8%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 16%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 69%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 69%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 0%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 16%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 0%
2011 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 5%
2011 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 5%
2011 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2011 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 0%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top