Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Mark E. Udall's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Women

Office: U.S. Senate (CO) - Sr, Democratic

Women

2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2013 Federally Employed Women - Positions 80%
2013 Jewish Women International - Positions 0%
2013 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2013 Young Women's Christian Association (YWCA) - Positions 33%
2012 Federally Employed Women - Positions 50%
2012 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2011-2012 American Association of University Women - Positions 90
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 5%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 8%
2011 Federally Employed Women - Positions 100%
2011 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2010 Federally Employed Women - Positions 50%
2010 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 American Association of University Women - Positions 80%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 6%
2009 American Association of University Women - Positions 75%
2009 Federally Employed Women - Positions 80%
2009 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2009 Women Employed - Positions 100%
2007-2008 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 19%
2007-2008 Federally Employed Women - Equality in Government Score 70
2007-2008 National Organization for Women - Positions 100%
2007 American Association of University Women - Positions 100
2007 Federally Employed Women - Positions 70%
2007 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2006 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2006 United States Women's Chamber of Commerce - Positions 89%
2006 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 100%
2005-2006 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 31%
2005-2006 Federally Employed Women - Positions 70%
2005-2006 National Organization for Women - Positions 91%
2005 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
2005 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2005 National Organization for Women - Positions 100%
2004 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2004 United States Women's Chamber of Commerce - Positions 50%
2003-2004 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 77%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 16%
2003-2004 Federally Employed Women - Positions 60%
2003-2004 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 98%
2003 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
2003 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Positions 0%
2003 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 57%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 18%
2003 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2002 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Positions 0%
2002 National Organization for Women - Positions 0%
2001-2002 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 21%
2001-2002 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 93%
2001 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
2001 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Positions 100%
2001 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 45%
2000 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
1999-2000 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
1999 American Association of University Women - Positions 100%
1999 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top