or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

James Austin Scott

Representative James Austin Scott's Special Interest Group Ratings

James Austin Scott
Full Name: James Austin Scott
Current Office: U.S. House - District 8, Republican
First Elected: 11/02/2010
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014

Business and Consumers

2012 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 50%
2012 TechCrunch/CrunchGov - Positions on Technology Industry 75%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 77%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 14%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 5%
2011 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions (House Only) 100%
2011 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2011 National Retail Federation - Positions 100%
2011 National Small Business Association - Positions 100%
2011 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 100%
2011 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 100%
2011 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 87%
2009-2010 Georgia National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Georgia National Federation of Independent Business - Positions on Pro-Small Business Policy 100
2005-2006 Georgia National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%
2003 Georgia Chamber of Commerce - Positions 75%
2002 Georgia Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Georgia National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 71%
2001 Georgia Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100%
2000 Georgia Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100%
1999-2000 Georgia National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 83%
1999 Georgia Chamber of Commerce - Positions 89%
1998 Georgia Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100%
1997-1998 Georgia National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100%

Conservative

2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 94%
2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 96%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 78%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 92%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 92%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 76%
2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 100%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 17%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 100%
2011 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 23%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 57%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 77%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 83%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 0%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 41%
2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 85%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 90%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 90%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 90%
2007 Georgia Christian Alliance Formerly Christian Coalition of Georgia - Positions on Conservative Issues 90
2001-2002 Georgia Christian Alliance Formerly Christian Coalition of Georgia - Positions 67%
2001-2002 Georgia Conservative Coalition - Positions 67%
1999-2000 Georgia Christian Alliance Formerly Christian Coalition of Georgia - Positions 60%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top