or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Shelley Moore Capito

Shelley Moore Capito's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Liberal

Full Name: Shelley Moore Capito
Current Office: U.S. House - District 2, Republican
First Elected: 11/07/2000
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. Senate
General Nov. 4, 2014
Primary May 13, 2014

Liberal

2013-2014 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score (Jan. 13, 2014) 11%
2013-2014 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score (Jan. 13, 2014) 11%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes 2%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Overall Positions 6%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes Lifetime Score 6%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Lifetime Score 13%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes 2%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Overall Positions 6%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes Lifetime Score 6%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Lifetime Score 13%
2013 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 43%
2013 National Journal - Liberal (Composite) 37%
2013 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy 47%
2012 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 0%
2012 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 0%
2012 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2012 National Journal - House Liberal (Foreign) 43%
2012 National Journal - House Liberal (Economic) 43%
2012 National Journal - House Liberal (Social) 47%
2012 National Journal - House Liberal (Composite Score) 45%
2012 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 16%
2012 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 16%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 66%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 12%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 66%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 12%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 23%
2011 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 15%
2011 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 15%
2011 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 10%
2011 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 45%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 37%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 50%
2010 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 10%
2010 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 10%
2010 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 36%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 21%
2010 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 32%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 41
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 41
2009-2010 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 33%
2009-2010 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 33%
2009 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 30%
2009 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 30%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 10%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 10%
2009 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 38%
2009 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 34%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 35%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 26%
2009 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 27%
2009 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 27%
2008 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 60%
2008 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 60%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 40%
2008 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 39%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 43%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 31%
2008 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 83%
2008 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 83%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 33%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 33%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Oath of Office Score 0%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Oath of Office Score 0%
2007-2008 Progressive Democrats of America - Positions 44%
2007-2008 Progressive Democrats of America - Positions 44%
2007 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 35%
2007 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 35%
2007 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 50%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 32%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 38%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 42%
2007 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 38.2%
2007 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions on Social Justice and Peace 50
2007 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions on Social Justice and Peace 50
2006 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 15%
2006 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 15%
2006 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 35%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 6%
2006 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 32.2%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 45%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 41%
2006 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 50%
2006 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 50%
2005-2006 Campaign for America's Future - Energy Score 17%
2005-2006 Campaign for America's Future - Energy Score 17%
2005-2006 Freedom Democrats - Positions on Economic Issues 10%
2005-2006 Freedom Democrats - Positions on Social Issues 20%
2005-2006 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Conservative Action Score 43%
2005-2006 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Conservative Action Score 43%
2005 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 25%
2005 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 25%
2005 Hope for Peace and Justice - Positions 0
2005 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 25%
2005 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 15%
2005 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 15%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 45%
2005 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 41%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 42%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 33%
2005 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 17%
2005 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 17%
2004 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 30%
2004 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 30%
2004 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 35%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 50%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 25%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 40%
2004 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 13%
2004 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 13%
2003-2004 Radical Middle - Positions 10%
2003 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 15%
2003 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 15%
2003 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 30%
2003 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 5%
2003 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 5%
2003 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 44%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 41%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 47%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 40%
2003 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 17%
2003 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 17%
2002 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 15%
2002 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 15%
2002 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 45%
2002 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 44%
2002 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 44%
2002 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 25%
2002 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 25%
2001-2002 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 10%
2001-2002 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 10%
2001-2002 People for the American Way - Positions 12%
2001-2002 People for the American Way - Positions 12%
2001-2002 Radical Middle - Positions 0%
2001 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 20%
2001 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 20%
2001 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 45%
2001 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 3%
2001 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 3%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 33%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 43%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top