Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Kurt Schrader's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Labor Unions

Office: U.S. House (OR) - District 5, Democratic

2014 Endorsements

Labor Unions

2014 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 100%
2013-2014 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers - Positions (House) 100%
2013-2014 Workplace Choice - Positions 20
2013 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 95%
2013 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 86%
2013 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score 84%
2013 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 78%
2013 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions 0%
2012 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 84
2012 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score 83%
2012 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 81%
2012 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 83%
2012 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 80%
2011-2012 American Federation of Teachers - Positions 90%
2011-2012 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions (House) 37%
2011-2012 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 100%
2011 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 88%
2011 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 86%
2011 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Lifetime Score 88%
2011 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 100%
2011 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 71%
2010 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 93%
2010 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 92%
2010 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 100%
2010 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 100%
2010 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - House of Representatives Score 100%
2009-2010 Communications Workers of America - Positions 78%
2009-2010 International Brotherhood of Teamsters - Positions 93%
2009-2010 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions 0%
2009-2010 National Farmers Union - Positions 88%
2009-2010 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 86%
2009 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 77%
2009 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score 81%
2009 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 81%
2009 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 78%
2009 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 100%
2009 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 100%
2009 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 90%
2009 United Auto Workers - Positions 80%
2009 Women Employed - Positions 50%
2007 American Federation of Teachers-Oregon - Positions on Teaching Profession Issues 71
2005 American Federation of Teachers-Oregon - Positions 67%
2005 Oregon AFL-CIO - Positions 89%
2005 SEIU Local 503, Oregon Public Employees Union - Positions on Workplace Rights 60%
2005 SEIU Local 503, Oregon Public Employees Union - Positions on Workplace Rights 73%
2005 SEIU Local 503, Oregon Public Employees Union - Positions on Workplace Rights 100%
2003 American Federation of Teachers-Oregon - Positions 57%
2003 Oregon AFL-CIO - Positions 64%
2001-2002 Oregon AFL-CIO - Positions 72%
2001 Oregon AFL-CIO - Positions 75%
1999 Oregon AFL-CIO - Positions 43%
1997 Oregon AFL-CIO - Positions 63%
1997 SEIU Local 503, Oregon Public Employees Union - Positions 66%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top