Representative James 'Jim' Himes's Special Interest Group Ratings

Biographical

Full Name: James 'Jim' Himes
Current Office: U.S. House - District 4, Democratic
First Elected: 11/04/2008
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
Gender: Male
Family: Wife: Mary; 2 Children: Emma, Linley
Birth Date: 07/05/1966
Birth Place: Lima, Peru
Home City: Greenwich, CT
Religion: Christian (Presbyterian)
View 2012 Endorsements
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Business and Consumers

2012 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 60% 2012 TechCrunch/CrunchGov - Positions on Technology Industry 75% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 21% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 58% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 69% 2011 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions (House Only) 100% 2011 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 9% 2011 National Retail Federation - Positions 57% 2011 National Small Business Association - Positions 66% 2011 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 27% 2011 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 20% 2011 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 44% 2010 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 50% 2010 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 29% 2009-2010 American Council of Engineering Companies - Positions 90% 2009-2010 Associated General Contractors of America - Positions 37% 2009-2010 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 26% 2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 68% 2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 47% 2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 11 2009-2010 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 47% 2009-2010 National Retail Federation - Positions 25% 2009-2010 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 44% 2009-2010 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 14% 2009 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 40%

Conservative

2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 5% 2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 4% 2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 14% 2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 6% 2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 0% 2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 11% 2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 24% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 80% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 33% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 31% 2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 25% 2011 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 75% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 68% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 20% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 67% 2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 9% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 20% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 15% 2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 15% 2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 13% 2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 9% 2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 11% 2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 46% 2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 46% 2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 54% 2010 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 46% 2010 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 54% 2010 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 54% 2010 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 45% 2010 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 52% 2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 0% 2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 0% 2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 10% 2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 8% 2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0% 2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 4% 2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 3% 2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 10% 2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 4% 2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 4% 2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 9% 2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 4% 2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 5% 2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 23% 2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 34% 2009 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 34% 2009 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 42% 2009 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 67% 2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 30% 2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 20% 2009 The Club for Growth - Positions 10% 2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 0% 2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 0% 2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 0%

Employment and Affirmative Action

Labor Unions

2011-2012 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 100% 2011 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 90% 2011 Federally Employed Women - Positions 100% 2011 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 71% 2010 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 93% 2010 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 92% 2010 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 100% 2010 Federally Employed Women - Positions 50% 2010 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 100% 2010 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - House of Representatives Score 50% 2009-2010 Communications Workers of America - Positions 78% 2009-2010 International Brotherhood of Teamsters - Positions 93% 2009-2010 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions 0% 2009-2010 National Association for the Self-Employed - U.S. House Score 100% 2009-2010 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 83% 2009 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 100% 2009 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 95% 2009 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score 95% 2009 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 89% 2009 Federally Employed Women - Positions 90% 2009 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 100% 2009 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 100% 2009 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100% 2009 Women Employed - Positions 50%

Liberal

2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 69% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 58% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 21% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 33% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 80% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 31% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 20% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 67% 2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 25% 2011 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 75% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 68% 2010 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90% 2010 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 46% 2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 46% 2010 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 45% 2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 46% 2010 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 54% 2010 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 52% 2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 54% 2010 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 54% 2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 47% 2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 11 2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 68% 2009 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95% 2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 41% 2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 10% 2009 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 67% 2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 77% 2009 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 57% 2009 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 64% 2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 34%

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.