or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Bobby Bright

Bobby Bright's Special Interest Group Ratings

Bobby Bright
Full Name: Bobby Bright

Conservative

2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 65%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 58%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 77%
2010 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 40%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 40%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 36%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 44%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 60%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 64%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 55%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 60%
2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 65%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 67%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 75%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 91%
2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 86%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 60%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 51%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 72%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 72%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 90%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 77%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 62%
2009 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 38%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 67%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 63%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 58%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 62%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 70%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 62%
2009 The Club for Growth - Positions 64%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 40%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 30%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 50%

Employment and Affirmative Action

2009 Women Employed - Positions 0%

Labor Unions

2010 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 20%
2010 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 8%
2010 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 0%
2010 Federally Employed Women - Positions 40%
2010 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 25%
2010 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - House of Representatives Score 0%
2009-2010 Communications Workers of America - Positions 11%
2009-2010 International Brotherhood of Teamsters - Positions 33%
2009-2010 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions 100%
2009-2010 National Association for the Self-Employed - U.S. House Score 50%
2009-2010 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 16%
2009 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 23%
2009 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score 35%
2009 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 35%
2009 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 33%
2009 Federally Employed Women - Positions 50%
2009 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 33%
2009 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 0%
2009 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 18%
2009 Women Employed - Positions 0%

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

2009-2010 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 10%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top