Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Margaret 'Maggie' M. Jeffus's Ratings and Endorsements

Environment

2012 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2012 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 85%
2011 Environment North Carolina - Positions 100%
2011 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 82%
2011 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 83%
2011 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 84%
2010 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 79%
2010 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 83%
2009-2010 Environment North Carolina - Positions 80%
2009-2010 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 81%
2009 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 79%
2009 Environment North Carolina - Positions 82%
2009 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 78%
2008 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 78%
2008 Environment North Carolina - Positions 100%
2007-2008 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 82%
2007 Environment North Carolina - Positions on Environmental Conservation 80
2007 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 63
2006 Environment North Carolina - Positions on Environmental Conservation 50
2006 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 50%
2005-2006 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 75%
2005 Environment North Carolina - Positions 89%
2005 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2003-2004 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 78%
2003 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 75%
2002 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 86%
2001 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2000 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 88%
1999 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
1997 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top