Representative Ben Ray Lujan, Jr.'s Special Interest Group Ratings

Biographical

Full Name: Ben Ray Lujan, Jr.
Current Office: U.S. House - District 3, Democratic
First Elected: 11/04/2008
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. House - District 3
Primary June 3, 2014
Gender: Male
Family: Single
Birth Date: 06/07/1972
Birth Place: Nambe, NM
Home City: Nambe, NM
Religion: Catholic
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Conservative

2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 10% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 5% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 10% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 5% 2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 16% 2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 16% 2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 16% 2013 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Workplace Choice (August, 2013) 0% 2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0% 2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0% 2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2013 FreedomWorks - Positions 29% 2013 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy 7% 2013 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy 0% 2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 32% 2013 National Journal - Conservative (Composite) 16% 2013 National Right to Life Committee - Positions (Jan. 14, 2014) 0% 2013 The Club for Growth - Positions 12% 2013 The Club for Growth - Positions (lifetime) 8% 2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 20% 2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 20% 2013 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 35 2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 3% 2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 4% 2012 Catholic Advocate - Positions 0% 2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2012 Family Research Council - Positions 0% 2012 FreedomWorks - Positions 15% 2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Foreign) 22% 2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Social) 22% 2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Economic) 26% 2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Composite Score) 24% 2012 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 16% 2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 16% 2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 23% 2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 23% 2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 5% 2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 2% 2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 5% 2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 2% 2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0% 2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0% 2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 3% 2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 3% 2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 10% 2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 10% 2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 10% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 74% 2011-2012 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0% 2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 8% 2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 3% 2011 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0% 2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 3% 2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 3% 2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 38% 2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 38% 2011 Family Research Council - Positions 0% 2011 FreedomWorks - Positions 5% 2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 0% 2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 0% 2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 0% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 21% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 18% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 34% 2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 25% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 78% 2011 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0% 2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 13% 2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 8% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 25% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 25% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 20% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 20% 2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 25% 2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 0% 2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 0% 2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2010 FreedomWorks - Positions 0% 2010 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 80% 2010 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 20% 2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 29% 2010 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 21% 2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 25% 2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 0% 2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 0% 2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 0% 2009-2010 American Family Association - Positions 0% 2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0% 2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0% 2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0% 2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0% 2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 10% 2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0% 2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0% 2009-2010 Family Research Council - Positions 0% 2009-2010 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0% 2009-2010 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 4% 2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 8% 2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 8% 2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 10% 2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 10% 2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 10% 2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 10% 2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 0% 2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 0% 2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0% 2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0% 2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2009 FreedomWorks - Positions 0% 2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 5% 2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 5% 2009 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 28% 2009 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 18% 2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 9% 2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 20% 2009 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0% 2009 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 4% 2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 23% 2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 23% 2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 7% 2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 7% 2009 The Club for Growth - Positions 2% 2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 0% 2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 20% 2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 10% 2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 0% 2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 20% 2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 10% 2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 8%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.