or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Gregg Harper

Gregg Harper's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Budget, Spending and Taxes

Full Name: Gregg Harper
Current Office: U.S. House - District 3, Republican
First Elected: 11/04/2008
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House - District 3
Primary June 3, 2014
Hardy Caraway
(Running)
Republican
Roger Gerrard
(Running)
Independent
Jim Liljeberg
(Running)
Democratic
Douglas Magee
(Running)
Democratic
Dennis Quinn
(Running)
Democratic
Barbara Dale Washer
(Running)
Reform

Budget, Spending and Taxes

2013 Bread for the World - Positions 30%
2013 FreedomWorks - Positions 43%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy 53%
2013 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy 47%
2013 The Club for Growth - Positions (lifetime) 70%
2013 The Club for Growth - Positions 41%
2012 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 10%
2012 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 8%
2012 Bread for the World - Positions 0%
2012 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 7%
2012 FreedomWorks - Positions 45%
2012 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 70%
2012 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 70%
2012 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 24%
2012 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 0%
2011 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 0%
2011 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 60%
2011 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 0%
2011 FreedomWorks - Positions 72%
2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 71%
2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 71%
2011 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 17%
2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 63%
2010 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 91%
2010 FreedomWorks - Positions 95%
2010 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 88%
2010 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 19%
2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 84%
2009-2010 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 3%
2009 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 10%
2009 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 10%
2009 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 72%
2009 FreedomWorks - Positions 90%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 94%
2009 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 85%
2009 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 85%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 100%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 76%
2009 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 17
2009 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 9%
2009 The Club for Growth - Positions 90%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top