Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Key Votes

AM 4 to S 398 - Prohibiting Payday Lending Amendment - Key Vote

South Carolina Key Votes

Luke Rankin, Sr. voted Nay (Tabling Vote) on this Legislation.

Read statements Luke Rankin, Sr. made in this general time period.

Stages

Family

Issues

Stage Details

Legislation - Bill Tabled (Senate) (23-18) - (Key vote)

Title: Prohibiting Payday Lending Amendment

Vote Smart's Synopsis:

Vote to table an amendment that prohibits payday lending and establishes penalties.

Highlights:
- Finds that anyone who violates this provision is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by fines ranging from $1000 to $5000 and imprisonment for no more than three years [sec. 1 (16-17-340)]. - Enables the State to recover a civil penalty equal to three times the amount of any interest or charges gained from the payday loan. [sec. 1 (16-17-350)]. - Taxes violators at a rate of 75 percent times the amount of the proceeds earned from all payday loans [sec. 1 (16-17-360)]. - Prohibits any person who provides payday loans from obtaining a license to operate a legal business [sec 1 (16-17-380)].
Note:

NOTE: A LEGISLATOR MAY MOVE TO TABLE ANY PENDING LEGISLATION, THUS HALTING FURTHER CONSIDERATION. A "YEA" VOTE IS IN SUPPORT OF HALTING FURTHER CONSIDERATION, AND A "NAY" VOTE IS IN SUPPORT OF FURTHER CONSIDERATION. TABLING MOTIONS ARE OFTEN USED TO KILL LEGISLATION.

Legislation - Introduced (Senate) -

Title: Prohibiting Payday Lending Amendment

Sponsors

  • John D. Hawkins (SC - R) (Out Of Office)
Skip to top
Back to top