or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Key Votes

AB 2529 - Peer Review Requirements for Regulatory Economic Impact Analysis - Key Vote

California Key Votes

Karen Bass voted Yea (Passage) on this Legislation.

Read statements Karen Bass made in this general time period.

Stages

Family

Issues

Stage Details

Legislation - Referred to Committee (Senate) -
Legislation - Bill Passed (House) (44-18) - (Key vote)

Title: Peer Review Requirements for Regulatory Economic Impact Analysis

Vote Smart's Synopsis:

Vote to pass a bill requiring externally peer reviewed economic impacts analysis for major proposed regulations.

Highlights:
  • Defines "related economic impacts analysis" as an analysis of the reasonably identifiable and significant impacts of a major proposed regulation based on empirical data or other scientific or economic findings, conclusions, or assumptions, including, but not limited to (Sec.1):
    • Short-term and long-term jobs affected by the major proposed regulation; and
    • The revenues to the General Fund and special funds attributable to the major proposed regulation.
  • Requires that an agency enter into an agreement with the National Bureau of Economic Research, the University of California, the California State University, or a group of economists of comparable stature and qualifications to conduct an external peer review of the related economic impacts analysis of the major proposed regulation (Sec. 1).
  • Prohibits persons with any conflict of interest from serving as an external peer reviewer of a proposed regulation (Sec. 1).
  • Authorizes that if an agency disagrees with the findings of the external peer reviewer it can explain its basis for disagreement as part of the rulemaking record and that a public hearing will be held in which the public can comment on the written report of the external peer reviewer and the agency's disagreement with that report (Sec. 1).
  • Specifies that once an external peer review of the related economic impacts analysis has been completed the agency will not be required to conduct additional peer reviews (Sec. 1).
Legislation - Introduced (House) -

Title: Peer Review Requirements for Regulatory Economic Impact Analysis

Sponsors

  • Felipe Fuentes (CA - D) (Out Of Office)
Back to top